European Integration With or Without Britain
Kemal Derviş22nd June 2016 - 307 days ago
When British Prime Minister David Cameron agreed with the European Union in February on revised terms for the United Kingdom’s membership, he insisted that the EU be recognized officially as a “multi-currency union.” With clear limits on European integration in place, on currency and other issues, Cameron believed that he would be able to win a popular majority in favor of the deal – and thus of remaining in the EU – when the UK holds its referendum on June 23. Yet, rather than providing such clarity, the pact uses contorted language to avoid such an official declaration – and the explanations that would have to come with it.
To be sure, the February decision did give Cameron enough to enable him to campaign against Brexit. By specifying that the UK and Denmark are under no obligation to adopt the euro, Cameron’s counterparts did effectively confirm the EU’s status as a multi-currency union.
Vice President and Director of Global Economy and Development at Brookings Institution
But the decision also reiterated the goal of creating an EU “whose currency is the euro,” and reaffirmed treaty provisions stipulating that other non-euro states, such as Bulgaria and Poland, must adopt the euro when they meet the pre-determined conditions. Sweden has no permanent opt-out, and does meet the conditions for euro adoption, yet somehow manages to avoid joining the monetary union. Read more.
Courtesy of Project Syndicate.
go back to newspage
- Our conference attendees thought Joanna Lumley was excellent. They loved her - she is a delight.
- Our fiscal group clients thought Julian Priestley was very approachable and gave an excellent speech.
- Wow! Eddie Obeng was excellent, our technology summit attendees loved him. Very thought provoking.
- Tim Foster was the highlight at our staff conference, the audience were fully engaged and enthusiastic.